n@rds - All Comments

re: Short-circuit evaluation in C# and VB.NET

Lightsabre — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:11:22 GMT

Get over the vb.net vs c#. There are hundreds, if not thousands of langauages with different sytnax and functionality. Every client is different and not every project 'allows' you to use your language of preference. Therefore get to know the ones in your area and 'know' the differences.

re: Short-circuit evaluation in C# and VB.NET

Euo — Fri, 30 May 2008 05:56:50 GMT

That's why I loved c# more now than vb.net and hoping that my future clients will not require me to write in vb.net again. :D

Another Real-World Example On When To Use Extension Methods

Keith Rull — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:33:00 GMT

It's funny, just after posting this post in response to an article that N@rds posted that I realized

re: System.IO.Directory.GetFiles() does not support multiple search pattern

keithrull — Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:05:33 GMT

Hi n@rds,

here's my approach.

www.keithrull.com/.../HowToSearchADirectoryForFilesUsingMultipleSearchPatterns.aspx

Thanks,

Keith

How To: Search a directory for files using multiple search patterns

Keith Rull — Sat, 02 Feb 2008 01:02:07 GMT

I was browsing at DevPinoy.org today when I saw this interesting post by n@rds about searching for files

re: Short-circuit evaluation in C# and VB.NET

n.ocampo — Mon, 01 Oct 2007 02:11:01 GMT

@cruizer: I also recommend VB.NET to those from VB6. I've came from that path also. But after switching from VB.NET to C# last year. I would say that I'm lovin' it. :P

@keith: same here. I only use VB.NET if our client prefers it.

re: Short-circuit evaluation in C# and VB.NET

keithrull — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:35:44 GMT

@cruizer: hey hey hey hey! i still use VB.NET :P I think VB won't go out anytime soon. I still use it whenever my client preffers it over curly brackets and i don't mind it either.

Here's a quick overview of how to accomplish AndAlso and OrElse in C#

www.c-sharpcorner.com/.../AndAlsoOrElseOperatorsinCSharp.aspx

re: Short-circuit evaluation in C# and VB.NET

cruizer — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:26:11 GMT

but really, who uses VB.NET? :P I'll only recommend it to those from a VB6 background, and even these are one of the few stuff that's really backward compatible between VB.NET and VB6...

if you're more familiar with C and its short-circuiting behavior, you'll be much better off with C# instead.

re: Short-circuit evaluation in C# and VB.NET

n.ocampo — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:59:59 GMT

Backward compatibility? yeah, it might be. But it would be more cleaner if they did "And" and "Or" be short-circuit evaluated, instead of introducing the "AndAlso" and "OrElse" keyword.

re: Short-circuit evaluation in C# and VB.NET

cruizer — Fri, 28 Sep 2007 08:18:48 GMT

not sure, but it could be that And and Or did not perform short-circuit eval on old VB (not .NET). so they did this for backward compatibility of sorts.

http://enderminh.com/netdev/

TrackBack — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 07:48:21 GMT

re: technical skills != opportunity

ronin — Mon, 03 Sep 2007 08:19:17 GMT

Leave TCS behind and go apply for other companies in Singapore. TCS is not for you.

re: technical skills != opportunity

lamia — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:47:56 GMT

@cruizer

Single responsibility principle in a sense yung sakin. Lolz!

Sorry nde pa ako acquainted sa principle na yan. Post more links about it para mabuksan ang aking kaisipan. :)

re: technical skills != opportunity

cruizer — Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:56:47 GMT

@lamia -- violation ng "tell don't ask" principle yun code mo ah. he he dapat

this.executeIfGuilty();

ha ha :P

re: technical skills != opportunity

lamia — Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:51:29 GMT

I see. Siguro nga kanya kanyang preferences lang yan. :)

Yeah, somehow with this post I was made aware of. Thanks. :)